Wines Reviewed In This Article

NV Blanc de Noirs

NV Brut Prestige

NV Demi-Sec

NV Cuvee M

NV Reserve Brut

2001 Blanc de Blancs

2001 Winery Lake

2000 Grande Annee

2003 Sparkling Pinot Meunier

1992 DVX

1993 DVX

1994 DVX

1995 DVX

1996 DVX

1997 DVX

1998 DVX

1999 DVX

1999 DVX Santana

1999 DVX Rose

 

 

  |

I have always enjoyed Mumm Napa ® wines. They have consistently been very good and priced quite attractively, and yet I am always left feeling that they could have been great. They are like the athlete who is very good and has the potential to win, but never does. They just can’t quite put it all together and they should be able to.

Mumm Napa Valley has long been one of the best sparkling wine producers in California and for a time in the mid 1990s was producing better wines than their parent company Mumm in Champagne. It was founded in 1979 as the top secret “Project Lafayette” and began releasing wine in 1987. They grow and source most of their grapes from the Carneros region and rely most heavily on the two main Champagne grapes of Pinot Noir and Chardonnay, which share the bill equally at Mumm Napa with a few Pinot Meunier and Pinot Gris curveballs thrown in to keep you honest.

When Seagram (Mumm Champagne’s parent company) decided to open up shop in the US, Guy Devaux, who had been the winemaker at Gold Seal’s New York Champagne up until 1979, was hired as the first winemaker at Mumm Napa. Seagram knew about Guy, as they had recently purchased Gold Seal. Guy was born in France and worked in the Champagne world through the late 1940s and 1950s before joining Gold Seal in 1960. He did some pretty good work with New York grapes in the 1960s and 1970s, and then topped that by doing one of the best jobs anyone has ever done of starting up a US sparkling wine house. When Mumm Napa officially opened in 1987, Greg Fowler (who led Schramsberg during its heyday in the 1980s) joined Mumm Napa and began to take the reigns of the winemaking. Together, Guy and Greg produced top notch wines in the early 1990s. Guy retired and officially passed the baton to Greg in 1992; in 1995, he passed away much too soon. To honor Guy’s work, Mumm Napa created their tete de cuvee DVX in his honor. They also have named one of their top vineyards after him.

Greg continued Guy’s work and led Mumm to its greatest height in the mid 1990s; their 1994-1996 cuvees rank as some of the best ever out of California (with Roederer Estate, Gloria Ferrer, and Domaine Carneros). In fact, I believe that if you look back over time, the mid 1990s (1993-1997) will be seen as a golden age and turning point in California sparkling wine. During these years, the best from California could stand shoulder to shoulder with Champagne. In 1997, the sky seemed to be the limit for Mumm Napa

With Mumm Napa doing so well, Greg was promoted and needed some help so he brought in his old friend Rob McNeil in 1997 to lead the winemaking. Rob had worked under Greg at Schramsberg and they made very nice wine together, but Rob never seemed to shine on his own as the head winemaker. McNeil had previously handled the winemaking duties at Piper Sonoma and Schramsberg.

In my opinion, those wines didn’t fair too well under his lead, and the quality actually regressed during this time. A similar trend seemed to occur at Mumm Napa, as (I feel that) after Rob took over, Mumm fell from the top tier of US Sparkling wine producers.

Why did this happen? There are many reasons, but I believe the key is that Rob has always been a big advocate for malolactic fermentation and easy drinking wines that may be more appealing at the time of purchase, but sometimes taste a bit forced and fake to me. Mumm Napa has done well for itself, but they never reach the heights they could and should.

Right before the 2002 harvest, Rob McNeil took on more management responsibilities and brought in Ludovic Dervin to take over the winemaking. I think this was a wise move, as Ludovic has helped lift Mumm Napa up once again. They still have a way to go to reach the big 3 of Gloria Ferrer, Roederer Estate, and Domaine Carneros, but they are clawing and scratching. Ludovic brought out the very tasty and successful Mumm Napa Cuvee M and helped blend the very tasty 2004 25th Anniversary Cuvees. I still think he needs to reel back on the malolactic, because the wines have an excellent acidity and could age well and reach greater heights with a gentler malolactic touch. The DVX and even the basic wines showed this in the mid 1990s. They could once again.

I also wish Mumm would limit the number of Cuvees that they produce. Just take a look at their lineup below. I’m surprised they haven’t come out with a DVX Pinot Meunier Rose Justin Timberlake Demi-Sec Extended Tirage Cuvee yet. Looking at the list below, can you explain the differences between them all to me

Brut Prestige
Brut Prestige Extended Tirage
Reserve Brut
Blanc de Blancs
Blanc de Noirs
Demi-Sec
Cuvee M
Cuvee M Red
Winery Lake
Grand Annee
Sparkling Pinot Meunier
Sparkling Pinot Noir
DVX
DVX Santana
DVX Rose

Despite my complaints, Mumm Napa makes very good wines. I just can’t help but feel that the wines can and should be better. Mumm Napa should be one of the great ones.

Some quick facts/thoughts/opinions:

  • The Blanc de Blancs is a blend of 60-80% Chardonnay and 20-40% Pinot Gris (varies by vintage).
  • The DVX is normally around 50% Chardonnay, 50% Pinot Noir
  • The Santana DVX is identical to the regular DVX except that it has a slightly higher dosage. Both cuvees are Bruts, but the Santana has 4-5 g/L more residual sugar.
  • The Blanc de Noirs oddly enough contains some Chardonnay and is approximately 85% Pinot Noir and 15% Chardonnay
  • The Brut Prestige is approximately 50% Pinot Noir, 45% Chardonnay, and 5% Pinot Meunier
  • The Cuvee M is from a blend that is very similar to the Brut Prestige only it sees a Sec dosage of 31 g/L.
  • The Reserve Brut is normally around 50% Chardonnay, 50% Pinot Noir, but the blend can vary across years
  • The Winery Lake is approximately 75% Pinot Noir, 25% Chardonnay
  • The Sparkling Pinot Meunier is 100% Pinot Meunier (you would think that would be self explanatory, but I note it because you would think a Blanc de Noirs would not include Chardonnay)
  • The Sparkling Pinot Noir is different in that it is made to be a Pinot Noir and then fermented a second time to add some fizz. This makes it different than any other Rose, Blanc de Noirs, or Sparkling Red you have had.
  • Mumm Napa makes close to a dozen other cuvees that I do not have grape information on. They often change their blends and don’t make every cuvee each year so it is a constantly changing situation.
  • The Rose wines are made by adding red wine to the blend. The DVX Rose is made with a 5% Red Wine Addition.
  • Oak fermentation is done on some of the wines. It is done with a light touch and the DVX sees the most of it.
  • Malolactic Fermentation is done to some degree on all the cuvees. It has been rising over the last few years.


Brad Baker with his wife, Michelle in a September 2006 visit to Mumm Napa

Mumm NV Blanc de NoirsNV Blanc de Noirs
This wine takes on a light rose color which matches the ripe cherry and cranberry nose. It has a fluffy strawberry flavor with hints of raspberries. I’d prefer to see it with a bit more bottle age, as I’ve always enjoyed this wine with a couple of years on it. Still, as a youngster, it is a very solid and enjoyable effort. Grade of B (83-85 pts). Find this wine

Mumm NV Brut PrestigeNV Brut Prestige
Mumm Napa doesn’t make anything second rate. This is bottom of the line, but still a very nice, easy drinking wine with loads of fluffy apple and pear fruit that meshes with a decent dose of acidity. It doesn’t move me, but it is a simple crowd pleasing wine that is hard to find fault with for the price and availability. Grade of Solid B- (81-82 pts). Find this wine

NV Demi-Sec
A light and fluffy flavor leads you into a lukewarm honey coated biscuit. You can tell the base wine is high quality and I wish this were a basic brut as the sweetness detracts rather than adds to the wine. I would have preferred my biscuit fresh out of the oven and without the honey. Grade of High B- (82-83 pts). Find this wine

NV Cuvee M
This has always been a guilty pleasure of mine and it showed wonderfully, as always. I love this young and fresh when it explodes in your mouth with a bright burst of sweet citrus. The base wine is not as good as the Demi-Sec, but the total package comes across better. This was meant to be a sweet wine and the creamy, fluffy, sweet finish closes it out with aplomb. Grade of Low B (83-84 pts) Find this wine

NV Reserve Brut
A sweet complex honey, pear, and melon nose leads into very fruity palate that is not quite at the same level as the nose. A nice touch of toast does show up to go with citrus and pears. A very solid and well made effort. Grade of Low B (83-84 pts). Find this wine

2001 Blanc de Blancs
This shows lots of pears with a few dough notes, but isn’t doing much for me as it comes across as clumsy and a bit flabby. Despite its mid-level billing, I have never been much of a fan and it showed as the worst of the Mumm Napas. I wish I could say age will help it, but it won’t. Mumm Napa does much better with the blends that are primarily or at least lean towards Pinot varieties. Grade of High C+ (78-80 pts). Find this wine

2001 Winery Lake
Light fluffy apples and citrus blossoms lead into a wonderful citrus and cream puff flavor. This is still quite young and should improve over time. A very nice wine. Grade of High B (85-87 pts). Find this wine

2000 Grande Annee
Holy cow, where did this wine come from? Chocolate and biscuits lead the nose and help lead a mature and complex creamy palate. I would very easily put this up there with many top notch cellar aged NV Champagnes. I think this is the best of the current Mumm Napa releases. Yum, yum. Grade of High B+ (88-89 pts). Find this wine

2003 Sparkling Pinot Meunier
I’m not quite used to so much cream showing on the nose, so this strikes me as different, but in a good way. It is very fruity with a nice fluffy peach mouth feel and a touch of slightly spiced earth. Mumm Napa did a very nice job here, as it does an excellent job showing that Pinot Meunier does not have to be a throw away sparkling wine grape.   Grade of B (83-85 pts).  Find this wine

Mumm DVX1992 DVX
A creamy citrus and toasted almond and walnut concoction that is fun to drink, but has lost too much acidity and citrus for my palate. I see no reason to let this sit. If you have a bottle, pop and enjoy, as it isn’t gong anywhere but down. Grade of High B- (82-83 pts). Find this wine

1993 DVX
Lots of creamy nuts and bright citrus lead you into this wine, but it is missing something. It seems on the decline and a bit hollow and toned down when compared to following vintages. Grade of B- (80-82 pts). Find this wine

1994 DVX
A monumental wine of absolute fruit. Oranges, peaches, pears, and few more citrus varieties are packed into this bottle and rolled up in a creamy walnut laced dough that is just starting to turn into bread. This is a go right now, and it starts the wonderful three-peat glory run of DVX that ended with a change in style in 1997. Grade of Solid A- (91 pts). Find this wine

1995 DVX
This is a spicy, sweet peach cobbler in a glass. What can I say; I love this wine. A zesty citrus bread filled back palate promises plenty of life in the years ahead. Grade of A- (90-91 pts). Find this wine

1996 DVX
Lots of concentrated citrus and zesty, fresh rolled dough fill my nose and mouth. This is one lively wine. Peaches and cream also join the party and the party isn’t going full blast yet. It will get even better with a bit more time. Grade of B+ (88-89 pts) with A- (90-91 pt) potential. Find this wine

1997 DVX
A very creamy wine with typical DVX spicy bread notes, but this has an awkwardness to it. It just seems a bit bland when compared to past vintages. I know Mumm Napa loved the 1997 harvest, so maybe this just needs time, but I can’t help but think that won’t help it. What really grabs me about this wine is that with the 1997, the malolactic and creaminess seem to come more to fore. The current trademark Mumm Napa creaminess can be traced back to this year. I think this will affect the aging and improvement that previous DVX vintages saw in a negative way. This vintage ended the glory years of the DVX in my eyes and they are no longer a must buy. Grade of B (83-86 pts). Find this wine

1998 DVX
Bright apples, pears, & citrus mix with a bit of baking spice and cream. Overall, this wine seems a bit too smooth and easy to me, so much so that it takes on a very slight clumsy note from the malolactic being a little overdone. You would think this would be something that would get better with age, but I don’t think the malolactic regime it saw will let it. Grade of Low B+ (86-87 pts). Find this wine

1999 DVX
A huge pear led nose that shows cream, cream, and more trademark Mumm cream. This is a young wine full of apples, pears, and creamy walnuts with a creamy and crisp finish. I would love to say that age will treat this wine well, but I don’t think it is going anywhere. You can drink it now or a bit later with no worries, but it isn’t getting better. That is okay as it is very good now. I just wish it would not be so creamy so young. A bit of aged complexity potential would be nice. Grade of B+ (87-88 pts). Find this wine

1999 DVX Santana
This is very similar to the basic 1999 DVX with an added touch of spice and sweetness on the nose and palate. The fruit is just as bright and fresh. I like the wine, but not as much as the basic DVX and don’t really see a reason for its existence. The last thing Mumm Napa needed was one more wine. Grade of B (83-85 pts). Find this wine

1999 DVX Rose
Another creamy Mumm Napa effort, but the red fruits are rather bland. This doesn’t show the acidity to age and improve or the complexity that its price tag would lead you to expect. It shows some nice young biscuit notes and the pink color is attractive, but I don’t drink wine for its color. This needs to kick it up a notch. I actually like the NV Blanc de Noirs better. Grade of low B (82-84 pts). Find this wine

Cheers!

Brad Baker

BACK TO THE TOP

BACK TO BRAD BAKER'S INDEX PAGE

© Brad Baker 

Link to Gang of Pour Home Page

Link to Gang of Pour Site Index (Table of Contents)